Lifting the veil of uncertainty from the future of science undergraduates
There is a lot of uncertainty on
the path of becoming a researcher. A part of it is fueled by the current science
education scenario of the country. Most of the students who take up science
courses at undergraduate level wish to pursue scientific research, but is the
current science education in the country training these passionate minds to
become researchers?
A similar question was asked by
Dr. Jyotsna Vijapurkar’s research lab through scientific testing, which was
published in International Journal of STEM Education. She and her team members assessed
Microbiology/Biotechnology curriculum of colleges in Mumbai, to better
understand whether the students enrolled in these courses are getting prepared
for a career in their field. The study was designed to test undergraduate
students on their application of the concepts that they had learnt in practical
and theory classes. For example, they were asked how they can sterilize the
following, a) vitamin solution, b) hospital linen, c) petri plates.
The responses of the students in
most cases were not satisfactory, even though they had studied concepts of
sterilization (which is to make something free of germs) in theory class, but
not directly practiced the different methods of sterilization in the lab.
The gaps between science teaching and how to apply those concepts in real world were further highlighted in this study. The following reasons seem to be the major roadblocks for this absence of translation between understanding and applying of the learned facts by students:
1. Examination
system tests students on just learning the facts and not on problem solving and
clarity of concepts.
2. Practical classes do not
encourage students to conduct research, but
rather to perform an experiment with predictable results in the labs, with
protocols provided by teachers.
What the researchers suggested are some interesting ways to solve one of the problems with the current practice in science education in our country - the absence of opportunities in the undergraduate curriculum to equip students with the necessary skills for careers in the field.
One way to address this is to redesign practical classes to inculcate problem solving skills, for example, by doing activities like making students test different sterilization methods in the lab (suggested for the Microbiology students’ curriculum).
Another approach is to divide the entire lab curriculum into small projects, which the students can complete in groups during their three years of undergraduate training (this can be followed by most of the science courses in the country). These teaching approaches are also backed up by multiple researchers and would not only make science education more engaging for students but would make learning better and train the students in becoming effective researchers and exceling in their field.
One way to address this is to redesign practical classes to inculcate problem solving skills, for example, by doing activities like making students test different sterilization methods in the lab (suggested for the Microbiology students’ curriculum).
Another approach is to divide the entire lab curriculum into small projects, which the students can complete in groups during their three years of undergraduate training (this can be followed by most of the science courses in the country). These teaching approaches are also backed up by multiple researchers and would not only make science education more engaging for students but would make learning better and train the students in becoming effective researchers and exceling in their field.
The different job options that a
Microbiology graduate can pursue include the following:
1. Research Scholar
2. Industrial Scientist
3. Lab technician
4. Teacher
1. Research Scholar
2. Industrial Scientist
3. Lab technician
4. Teacher
Most undergraduate students
wanted to pursue a career in scientific research when were asked specifically. What
was saddening was the fact that the teachers themselves assessed their students
to be suitable for becoming technicians (60% teachers thought so), rather than becoming
researchers (only 9% teachers chose this career option) or working in industry
(4%, included in others category), unless they get the required further
training after completing their undergraduate course.
Dr. Jyotsna Vijaypurkar’s lab is
situated in Homi Bhabha Center for Science Education (HBCSE), which is an
integral part of Tata Institute of Fundamental Research (TIFR), Mumbai. Her
research focus is in science education, and she works to improve science
curriculum in schools along with developing methods for how to make students
better understand science concepts. She also researches on what teaching
practices are best suited for middle school science teachers, promoting
enquiry-based teaching. Through her research work she has been trying to bring
the much-needed change in the science education ecosystem of our country.
You can read the paper
(it is freely accessible) published in International Journal of STEM Education here:
As far as the question on
sterilization mentioned in the post is concerned, please feel free to write to
me for knowing the answer.
Credits: Inputs by Dr. Jyotsna Vijaypurkar
Credits: Inputs by Dr. Jyotsna Vijaypurkar
Brilliant job by you, encounter the fear of being called as Science
ReplyDeleteThank you so much Mr. Rajeev. :)
DeleteRajeev Singh
ReplyDeleteI am thankful to this blog for giving me unique and helpful knowledge about this topic.stem India
ReplyDelete